Nutrition as a driver and outcome of agroecology

  • IPCC Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).

  • Building a Common Vision for Sustainable Food and Agriculture: Principles and Approaches (FAO, 2014).

  • De Schutter, O. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, Olivier De Schutter – Final Report: The Transformative Potential of the Right to Food (UN Human Rights Council, 2014).

  • Bezner Kerr, R. et al. Can agroecology improve food security and nutrition? A review. Glob. Food Sec. 29, 100540 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jones, A. D. et al. Farm-level agricultural biodiversity in the Peruvian Andes is associated with greater odds of women achieving a minimally diverse and micronutrient adequate diet. J. Nutr. 148, 1625–1637 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ickowitz, A. et al. Agricultural intensification, dietary diversity, and markets in the global food security narrative. Glob. Food Sec. 20, 9–16 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Talukder, A. et al. Increasing the production and consumption of vitamin A-rich fruits and vegetables: lessons learned in taking the Bangladesh homestead gardening programme to a national scale. Food Nutr. Bull. 21, 165–172 (2000).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bellon, M. R., Ntandou-Bouzitou, G. D. & Caracciolo, F. On-farm diversity and market participation are positively associated with dietary diversity of rural mothers in southern benin, West Africa. PLoS ONE 11, e0162535 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bezner Kerr, R. et al. in Sustainable Diets: Linking Nutrition and Food Systems 53–63 (eds Burlingame, B. & Dernini, S.) (CABI, 2019).

  • Wezel, A. et al. Agroecological principles and elements and their implications for transitioning to sustainable food systems. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 40, 40 (2020).

  • Agroecological and Other Innovative Approaches for Sustainable Agriculture and Food Systems That Enhance Food Security and Nutrition (HLPE, 2019).

  • Madsen, S. et al. Explaining the impact of agroecology on farm-level transitions to food security in Malawi. Food Sec. 13, 933–954 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Madsen, S. et al. Agroecological practices of legume residue management and crop diversification for improved smallholder food security, dietary diversity and sustainable land use in Malawi. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 45, 197–224 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Madsen, S. Farm-level pathways to food security: beyond missing markets and irrational peasants. Agric. Hum. Values 39, 135–150 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jones, A. D. Critical review of the emerging research evidence on agricultural biodiversity, diet diversity, and nutritional status in low-and middle-income countries. Nutr. Rev. 75, 769–782 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guidance on Mainstreaming Biodiversity for Nutrition and Health (World Health Organization, 2020).

  • Powell, B. et al. Improving diets with wild and cultivated biodiversity from across the landscape. Food Sec. 7, 535–554 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • English, M. M. The chemical composition of free-range and conventionally-farmed eggs available to Canadians in rural Nova Scotia. PeerJ 9, e11357 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kangmennaang, J. et al. Impact of a participatory agroecological development project on household wealth and food security in Malawi. Food Sec. 9, 561–576 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bezner Kerr, R. et al. Participatory agroecological research on climate change adaptation improves smallholder farmer household food security and dietary diversity in Malawi. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 279, 109–121 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bezner Kerr, R. et al. Repairing rifts or reproducing inequalities? Agroecology, food sovereignty, and gender justice in Malawi. J. Peasant Stud. 46, 1499–1518 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Trevilla Espinal, D. L. et al. Feminist agroecology: analyzing power relationships in food systems. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 45, 1029–1049 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Oliver, B. ‘The Earth gives us so much’: agroecology and rural women’s leadership in Uruguay. Cult. Agric. Food Environ. 38, 38–47 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cetrone, H. et al. A participatory agroecological intervention reduces women’s risk of probable depression through improvements in food security in Singida, Tanzania. Curr. Dev. Nutr. 4, 819–819 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Benítez, B. et al. Empowering women and building sustainable food systems: a case study of Cuba’s local agricultural innovation project. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 4, 554414 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Carvalho, L. M. & de Bógus, C. M. Gender and social justice in urban agriculture: the network of agroecological and peripheral female urban farmers from São Paulo. Soc. Sci. 9, 127 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nyantakyi-Frimpong, H. et al. Agroecology and sustainable food systems: participatory research to improve food security among HIV-affected households in northern Malawi. Soc. Sci. Med. 164, 89–99 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sylvester, O. & Little, M. ‘I came all this way to receive training, am I really going to be taught by a woman?’ Factors that support and hinder women’s participation in agroecology in Costa Rica. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 45, 957–980 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bezner Kerr, R. et al. Human and social values in agroecology: a review. Elementa 10, 00090 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Deaconu, A., Mercille, G. & Batal, M. The agroecological farmer’s pathways from agriculture to nutrition: a practice-based case from Ecuador’s highlands. Ecol. Food Nutr. 58, 142–165 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • April-Lalonde, G. et al. Characteristics and motivations of consumers of direct purchasing channels and the perceived barriers to alternative food purchase: a cross-sectional study in the Ecuadorian Andes. Sustainability 12, 6923 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nagib, G. & Nakamura, A. C. Urban agriculture in the city of São Paulo: new spatial transformations and ongoing challenges to guarantee the production and consumption of healthy food. Glob. Food Sec. 26, 100378 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Deaconu, A. et al. Agroecology and nutritional health: a comparison of agroecological farmers and their neighbors in the Ecuadorian highlands. Food Policy 101, 102034 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Barrios, E. D. et al. Agroecology: Fostering Improved Access to Land and Natural Resources (World Agroforestry, 2019).

  • Frison, E. & Clément, C. The potential of diversified agroecological systems to deliver healthy outcomes: making the link between agriculture, food systems & health. Food Policy 96, 101851 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Doss, C. R. Designing agricultural technology for African women farmers: lessons from 25 years of experience. World Dev. 29, 2075–2092 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bouwman, T., Andersson, J. & Giller, K. Herbicide induced hunger? Conservation agriculture, ganyu labour and rural poverty in central Malawi. J. Dev. Stud. 57, 244–263 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dumont, A. M. & Baret, P. V. Why working conditions are a key issue of sustainability in agriculture? A comparison between agroecological, organic and conventional vegetable systems. J. Rural Stud. 56, 53–64 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McCune, N. et al. Peasant balances and agroecological scaling in Puerto Rican coffee farming. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 43, 810–826 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Picó, C. et al. Biomarkers of nutrition and health: new tools for new approaches. Nutrients 11, 1092 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • TAPE: Tool for Agroecology Performance Evaluation: Process of Development and Guidelines for Application (Test Version) (FAO, 2019).

  • Mottet, A. et al. Assessing transitions to sustainable agricultural and food systems: a Tool For Agroecology Performance Evaluation (TAPE). Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 4, 252 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • De la Peña, I., Garrett, J. & Gelli, A. Nutrition-Sensitive Value Chains from a Smallholder Perspective: A Framework for Project Design IFAD Report No. 30 (IFAD, 2018).

  • Bechoff, A. et al. The NUTRI-P-LOSS (Nutritional Postharvest Loss) Methodology: A Guide for Researchers and Practitioners (IMMANA, 2019).

  • Santoso, M. V. et al. A nutrition-sensitive agroecology intervention in rural Tanzania increases children’s dietary diversity and household food security but does not change child anthropometry: results from a cluster-randomized trial. J. Nutr. 151, 2010–2021 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Niggli, U., Sonnevelt, M. & Kummer, S. Pathways to Advance Agroecology for a Successful Transformation to Sustainable Food Systems (Univ. Bonn, 2021).

  • Brouwer, I. et al. Reverse thinking: taking a healthy diet perspective towards food systems transformations. Food Sec. 13, 1497–1523 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brouwer, I. D., McDermott, J. & Ruben, R. Food systems everywhere: improving relevance in practice. Glob. Food Sec. 26, 100398 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Drexler, K. Government extension, agroecology, and sustainable food systems in Belize milpa communities: a socio-ecological systems approach. J. Agric. Food Syst. Commun. Dev. 9, 85–97 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Chappell, M. J. et al. Food sovereignty: an alternative paradigm for poverty reduction and biodiversity conservation in Latin America. F1000Res 2, 235 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pinckaers, P. J. M. et al. The anabolic response to plant-based protein ingestion. Sports Med. 51, 59–74 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Drexler, K. Climate-smart adaptations and government extension partnerships for sustainable milpa farming systems in Mayan communities of southern Belize. Sustainability 13, 3040 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Semba, R. D. et al. Legumes as a sustainable source of protein in human diets. Glob. Food Sec. 28, 100520 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • de Souza-Vilela, J., Andrew, N. & Ruhnke, I. Insect protein in animal nutrition. Anim. Prod. Sci. 59, 2029–2036 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Osmane, B. et al. Peas and beans as a protein feed for dairy cows. Agron. Res. 15, 2026–2038 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Madeira, M. S. et al. Microalgae as feed ingredients for livestock production and meat quality: a review. Livest. Sci. 205, 111–121 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Meena, R. S. et al. Legumes for Soil Health and Sustainable Management (Springer, 2018).

  • Nutrition and Food Systems (HLPE, 2017).

  • Food Losses and Waste in the Context of Sustainable Food Systems (HLPE, 2014).

  • Next Post

    These Are The Most Popular Dog Names Of 2022

    Tue Dec 6 , 2022
    According to a recent American Pet Products Association (APPA) survey, 69 million U.S. households include at least one dog. In addition, an overwhelming 90% of them consider their pup to be a family member. So, of course, choosing the right name is essential. Dog Name Trends Like baby names, some dog […]
    These Are The Most Popular Dog Names Of 2022

    You May Like