Mottet, A. et al. Livestock: on our plates or eating at our table? A new analysis of the feed/food debate. Glob. Food Sec. 14, 1–8 (2017).
Food and Agriculture Data Statistics (FAOSTAT) (FAO, 2022).
The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture: Sustainability in Action (FAO, 2020).
Bowles, N., Alexander, S. & Hadjikakou, M. The livestock sector and planetary boundaries: a ‘limits to growth’ perspective with dietary implications. Ecol. Econ. 160, 128–136 (2019).
Foley, J. A. et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478, 337–342 (2011).
Godfray, H. C. J. et al. Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327, 812–818 (2010).
Van Kernebeek, H. R., Oosting, S. J., Van Ittersum, M. K., Bikker, P. & De Boer, I. J. Saving land to feed a growing population: consequences for consumption of crop and livestock products. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 21, 677–687 (2016).
Schader, C. et al. Impacts of feeding less food-competing feedstuffs to livestock on global food system sustainability. R. Soc. Interface 12, 20150891 (2015).
Röös, E. et al. Greedy or needy? Land use and climate impacts of food in 2050 under different livestock futures. Glob. Environ. Change 47, 1–12 (2017).
van Hal, O. et al. Upcycling food leftovers and grass resources through livestock: impact of livestock system and productivity. J. Clean. Prod. 219, 485–496 (2019).
Van Zanten, H. H. E. et al. Defining a land boundary for sustainable livestock consumption. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 4185–4194 (2018).
Billen, G. et al. Reshaping the European agro-food system and closing its nitrogen cycle: the potential of combining dietary change, agroecology, and circularity. One Earth 4, 839–850 (2021).
Van Zanten, H. H., Van Ittersum, M. K. & De Boer, I. J. The role of farm animals in a circular food system. Glob. Food Sec. 21, 18–22 (2019).
Van Kernebeek, H. R. J., Oosting, S. J., Van Ittersum, M. K., Ripoll-Bosch, R. & De Boer, I. J. M. Closing the phosphorus cycle in a food system: insights from a modelling exercise. Animal 12, 1755–1765 (2018).
Van Selm, B. et al. Circularity in animal production requires a change in the EAT–Lancet diet in Europe. Nat. Food 3, 66–73 (2022).
Govoni, C. et al. Global assessment of natural resources for chicken production. Adv. Water Res. 154, 103987 (2021).
Devendra, C. & Sevilla, C. C. Availability and use of feed resources in crop–animal systems in Asia. Agric. Syst. 71, 59–73 (2002).
Luciano, A., Espinosa, C. D., Pinotti, L. & Stein, H. H. Standardized total tract digestibility of phosphorus in bakery meal fed to pigs and effects of bakery meal on growth performance of weanling pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 284, 115148 (2021).
Ertl, P., Zebeli, Q., Zollitsch, W. & Knaus, W. Feeding of by-products completely replaced cereals and pulses in dairy cows and enhanced edible feed conversion ratio. J. Dairy Sci. 98, 1225–1233 (2015).
Karlsson, J., Spörndly, R., Lindberg, M. & Holtenius, K. Replacing human-edible feed ingredients with by-products increases net food production efficiency in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 101, 7146–7155 (2018).
Global Livestock Environmental Assessment Model Version 2.0 (FAO, 2017).
Wirsenius, S. Human Use of Land and Organic Materials: Modeling the Turnover of Biomass in the Global Food System (Chalmers Univ. of Technology, 2000).
Herrero, M. et al. Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 20888–20893 (2013).
Tacon, A. G. J. & Hasan, M. R. Feed Ingredients and Fertilizers for Farmed Aquatic Animals: Sources and Composition (FAO, 2009).
Tacon, A. G. J. & Metian, M. Feed matters: satisfying the feed demand of aquaculture. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquac. 23, 1–10 (2015).
Froehlich, H. E., Runge, C. A., Gentry, R. R., Gaines, S. D. & Halpern, B. S. Comparative terrestrial feed and land use of an aquaculture-dominant world. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 5295–5300 (2018).
Karlsson, J. O. & Röös, E. Resource-efficient use of land and animals—environmental impacts of food systems based on organic cropping and avoided food–feed competition. Land Use Policy 85, 63–72 (2019).
Scarlat, N., Martinov, M. & Dallemand, J. F. Assessment of the availability of agricultural crop residues in the European Union: potential and limitations for bioenergy use. Waste Manage. (Oxf.) 30, 1889–1897 (2010).
Karlsson, J. et al. Future Nordic Diets: Exploring Ways for Sustainably Feeding the Nordics Vol. 2017566 (Nordic Council of Ministers, 2017).
FishStatJ—Software for Fishery and Aquaculture Statistical Time Series, version 3.04.12. (FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, 2020).
Tacon, A. G. J., Hasan, M. R. & Metian, M. Demand and Supply of Feed Ingredients for Farmed Fish and Crustaceans: Trends and Prospects FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 564 (FAO, 2011).
Troell, M. et al. Does aquaculture add resilience to the global food system? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 13257–13263 (2014).
van Hal, O. Upcycling Biomass in a Circular Food System: The Role of Livestock and Fish (Wageningen Univ., 2020).
Monteiro, M., Matos, E., Ramos, R., Campos, I. & Valente, L. M. P. A blend of land animal fats can replace up to 75% fish oil without affecting growth and nutrient utilization of European seabass. Aquaculture 487, 22–31 (2018).
Kummu, M. et al. Lost food, wasted resources: global food supply chain losses and their impacts on freshwater, cropland, and fertiliser use. Sci. Total Environ. 438, 477–489 (2012).
Pinotti, L., Giromini, C., Ottoboni, M., Tretola, M. & Marchis, D. Review: insects and former foodstuffs for upgrading food waste biomasses/streams to feed ingredients for farm animals. Animal 13, 1365–1375 (2019).
Pinotti, L. et al. Recycling food leftovers in feed as opportunity to increase the sustainability of livestock production. J. Clean. Prod. 294, 126290 (2021).
Liu, Y., Jha, R., Stein, H. H. & North Central Coordinating Committee on Swine Nutrition (NCCC-42). Nutritional composition, gross energy concentration, and in vitro digestibility of dry matter in 46 sources of bakery meals. J. Anim. Sci. 96, 4685–4692 (2018).
Giromini, C. et al. Nutritional evaluation of former food products (ex-food) intended for pig nutrition. Food Addit. Contam. A 34, 1436–1445 (2017).
Shurson, G. C., Urriola, P. E. & Ligt, J. L. Can we effectively manage parasites, prions, and pathogens in the global feed industry to achieve One Health? Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 69, 4–30 (2022).
Dou, Z., Galligan, D. & Shurson, G. Food waste as untapped resources for climate mitigation. In The Role of Agricultural Science and Technology in Climate 21 Project Implementation, pp. 14–17 (Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021).
Zu Ermgassen, E. K., Phalan, B., Green, R. E. & Balmford, A. Reducing the land use of EU pork production: where there’s swill, there’s a way. Food Policy 58, 35–48 (2016).
EC 1069/2009 Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying Down Health Rules as Regards Animal By-products and Derived Products Not Intended for Human Consumption and Repealing Regulation (EC) No. 1774/2002 (Animal By-products Regulation) (European Commission, 2009).
EC 142/2011 Commission Regulation (EU) No. 142/2011 Implementing Regulation (EC) No. 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying Down Health Rules as Regards Animal By-products and Derived Products Not Intended for Human Consumption and Implementing Council Directive 97/78/EC as Regards Certain Samples and Items Exempt from Veterinary Checks at the Border under That Directive (European Commission, 2011).
EC 1372/2021 Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1372 of 17 August 2021 Amending Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No. 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council as Regards the Prohibition to Feed Non-ruminant Farmed Animals, Other Than Fur Animals, with Protein Derived from Animals (European Commission, 2021).
Bindelle, J., Leterme, P. & Buldgen, A. Nutritional and environmental consequences of dietary fibre in pig nutrition: a review. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 12, 69–80 (2008).
Čolović, D., Rakita, S., Banjac, V., Đuragić, O. & Čabarkapa, I. Plant food by-products as feed: characteristics, possibilities, environmental benefits, and negative sides. Food Rev. Int. 35, 363–389 (2019).
Fry, J. P. et al. Environmental health impacts of feeding crops to farmed fish. Environ. Int. 91, 201–214 (2016).
Cottrell, R. S., Blanchard, J. L., Halpern, B. S., Metian, M. & Froehlich, H. E. Global adoption of novel aquaculture feeds could substantially reduce forage fish demand by 2030. Nat. Food 1, 301–308 (2020).
Zijlstra, R. T. & Beltranena, E. Swine convert co-products from food and biofuel industries into animal protein for food. Anim. Front. 3, 48–53 (2013).
Shi, C., Zhang, Y., Lu, Z. & Wang, Y. Solid-state fermentation of corn–soybean meal mixed feed with Bacillus subtilis and Enterococcus faecium for degrading antinutritional factors and enhancing nutritional value. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 8, 50 (2017).
Dawood, M. A. O. & Koshio, S. Application of fermentation strategy in aquafeed for sustainable aquaculture. Rev. Aquac. 12, 987–1002 (2019).
Pires, A. J. V., Carvalho, G. G. P. D. & Ribeiro, L. S. O. Chemical treatment of roughage. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 39, 192–203 (2010).
Muscat, A., Olde, E. M., Boer, I. J. & Ripoll-Bosch, R. The battle for biomass: a systematic review of food–feed–fuel competition. Glob. Food Sec. 25, 100330 (2020).
Herrero, M. et al. Articulating the effect of food systems innovation on the Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet Planet. Health 5, e50–e62 (2021).
Tacon, A. G. J. & Metian, M. Fishing for aquaculture: non-food use of small pelagic forage fish—a global perspective. Rev. Fish. Sci. 17, 305–317 (2009).
Cashion, T., Le Manach, F., Zeller, D. & Pauly, D. Most fish destined for fishmeal production are food-grade fish. Fish Fish. 18, 837–844 (2017).
EC COM/2020/98 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A New Circular Economy Action Plan for a Cleaner and More Competitive Europe (European Commission) (2020).
Government Resolution on the Strategic Programme for Circular Economy (Ministry of the Environment, Finland, 2021).
Mehmood, M. A. et al. Biomass production for bioenergy using marginal lands. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 9, 3–21 (2017).
Valentine, J. et al. Food vs. fuel: the use of land for lignocellulosic ‘next generation’ energy crops that minimize competition with primary food production. GCB Bioenergy 4, 1–19 (2012).
Mekonnen, M. M. & Hoekstra, A. Y. A global assessment of the water footprint of farm animal products. Ecosystems 15, 401–415 (2012).
Food Balance Sheets: A Handbook (FAO, 2001).
Pig Cost of Production in Selected Countries (ADHB Market Intelligence, 2015).
Pig Cost of Production in Selected Countries (ADHB Market Intelligence, 2019).
Jackson, A. Fish in–fish out ratios explained. Aquac. Eur. 34, 5–10 (2009).
On-Farm Feeding and Feed Management in Aquaculture (FAO, 2013).
García-Condado, S. et al. Assessing lignocellulosic biomass production from crop residues in the European Union: modelling, analysis of the current scenario and drivers of interannual variability. GCB Bioenergy 11, 809–831 (2019).
Gertenbach, W. D. & Dugmore, T. J. Crop residues for animal feeding. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 5, 49–51 (2004).
Ronzon, T., Piotrowski, S. & Carus, M. DataM—Biomass Estimates (v3): A New Database to Quantify Biomass Availability in the European Union (Institute for Prospective and Technological Studies, 2015).
Iram, A., Cekmecelioglu, D. & Demirci, A. Distillers’ dried grains with solubles (DDGS) and its potential as fermentation feedstock. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 104, 6115–6128 (2020).
Lynch, K. M., Steffen, E. J. & Arendt, E. K. Brewers’ spent grain: a review with an emphasis on food and health. J. Inst. Brew. 122, 553–568 (2016).
Technical Conversion Factors for Agricultural Commodities: Commodity Trees (FAO, 1996).
Global Food Losses and Food Waste—Extent, Causes and Prevention (FAO, 2011).
FAO Yearbook: Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics 2008 (FAO, 2010).
FAO Yearbook: Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics 2019 (FAO, 2019).
Shepherd, C. J. & Jackson, A. J. Global fishmeal and fish-oil supply: inputs, outputs and markets—global production of fishmeal and fish-oil. J. Fish Biol. 83, 1046–1066 (2013).
Cao, L. et al. China’s aquaculture and the world’s wild fisheries. Science 347, 133–135 (2015).
Stevens, J. R., Newton, R. W., Tlusty, M. & Little, D. C. The rise of aquaculture by-products: increasing food production, value, and sustainability through strategic utilisation. Mar. Policy 90, 115–124 (2018).
Animal Feed Resources Information System (Feedipedia, 2021).
Feedtables (INRA-CIRAD-AFZ, 2021).
Cho, J. H. & Kim, I. H. Fish meal—nutritive value. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 95, 685–692 (2011).
Frempong, N. S., Nortey, T. N., Paulk, C. & Stark, C. R. Evaluating the effect of replacing fish meal in broiler diets with either soybean meal or poultry by-product meal on broiler performance and total feed cost per kilogram of gain. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 28, 912–918 (2019).
Zier, C. E., Jones, R. D. & Azain, M. J. Use of pet food-grade poultry by-product meal as an alternate protein source in weanling pig diets. J. Anim. Sci. 82, 3049–3057 (2004).
Hua, K. et al. The future of aquatic protein: implications for protein sources in aquaculture diets. One Earth 1, 316–329 (2019).
Hardy, R. W. Utilization of plant proteins in fish diets: effects of global demand and supplies of fishmeal. Aquac. Res. 41, 770–776 (2010).
Woyengo, T. A., Beltranena, E. & Zijlstra, R. T. Nonruminant nutrition symposium: controlling feed cost by including alternative ingredients into pig diets—a review. J. Anim. Sci. 92, 1293–1305 (2014).
Jarrett, S. & Ashworth, C. J. The role of dietary fibre in pig production, with a particular emphasis on reproduction. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 9, 1–11 (2018).
Fadel, J. G., DePeters, E. J. & Arosemena, A. Composition and digestibility of beet pulp with and without molasses and dried using three methods. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 85, 121–129 (2000).
Puhakka, L., Jaakkola, S., Simpura, I., Kokkonen, T. & Vanhatalo, A. Effects of replacing rapeseed meal with fava bean at 2 concentrate crude protein levels on feed intake, nutrient digestion, and milk production in cows fed grass silage-based diets. J. Dairy Sci. 99, 7993–8006 (2016).
Ramin, M., Höjer, A. & Hetta, M. The effects of legume seeds on the lactation performance of dairy cows fed grass silage-based diets. Agric. Food Sci. 26, 129–137 (2017).
Lamminen, M., Halmemies-Beauchet-Filleau, A., Kokkonen, T., Vanhatalo, A. & Jaakkola, S. The effect of partial substitution of rapeseed meal and faba beans by Spirulina platensis microalgae on milk production, nitrogen utilization, and amino acid metabolism of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 102, 7102–7117 (2019).
Degola, L. & D, J. The influence of dietary inclusion of peas, faba bean and lupin as a replacement for soybean meal on pig performance and carcass traits. Agron. Res. 16, 389–397 (2018).
Koivunen, E., Tuunainen, P., Valkonen, E., Rossow, L. & Valaja, J. Use of faba beans (Vicia faba L.) in diets of laying hens. Agric. Food Sci. 23, 165–172 (2014).
Koivunen, E. et al. Digestibility and energy value of pea (Pisum sativum L.), faba bean (Vicia faba L.) and blue lupin (narrow-leaf) (Lupinus angustifolius) seeds in broilers. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 218, 120–127 (2016).
Code of Federal Regulations Title 21: Food and Drugs, Chapter I: Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Subchapter E: Animal Drugs, Feeds and Related Products, Part 589: Substances Prohibited from Use in Animal Food or Feed, Subpart B: Listing of Specific Substances Prohibited from Use in Animal Food or Feed, Sec. 589.2001: Cattle Materials Prohibited in Animal Food or Feed to Prevent Transmission of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (US Food and Drug Administration, 2020).
Good Practices for the Feed Sector—Implementing the Codex Alimentarius Code of Practice on Good Animal Feeding: FAO Animal Production and Health Manual (FAO and IFIF, 2020); https://doi.org/10.4060/cb1761en
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing v.4.0.5 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021).